Double Feature Duel
(Championship Match):
The Nines vs. Rise of the Planet of the Apes
The Nines vs. Rise of the Planet of the Apes
The
championship match is finally here. A couple surprising 10-buggers square off
in the final match in a great example of a good idea gone way too far. But if
you’re reading this, I suppose it was all worth it. Still a fun and interesting
experiment if I didn’t have a job or a wife or a hobby.
Title: Rule #3.4 section A states that any movie with more than five words
or 23 total characters shall be ineligible for competition in this category.
Section B continues on to explain tie-breakers in the case that two movies are
ineligible. Which I don’t need to do now. (Point, Nines 1-0)
Funnier: There’s a reason Will Ferrell
and Ben Stiller aren’t in either of these movies. But Ryan Reynolds puts in a
great performance in the second segment to sprinkle some humor on top. (Point, Nines 2-0)
Better Turn: The “turn,” as far as its
definition with respect to film terminology is concerned, is the point in which
the plot develops, or the first act (character development) yields way to the
second act (plot development). (Ed note: There is no film definition of “turn.”
He made it up.) Anyway, I think we all know how badass I think the scene where
Caesar shuts the gate is. And this is no different. (Point, Rise 2-1)
Better Ending: Both of these endings
are probably in the top 27% but not the top 8%. Rise connected the dots on
their way to show how the Planet of the Apes could have begun. The Nines tied
together three vignettes and introduced an interesting question of the nature
of creation. It’s a tough one and I appreciate how Rise was able to be a
prequel of sorts to the Planet of the Apes, but I really remember (barely at
this point) being blown away by The Nines’ ending. Besides, Rise is coming out
with a sequel, which should devalue the ending further. (Point, Nines 3-1)
Better Message: Maybe I’ve said this before,
but Rise brings up a lot of issues of both chemical testing in animals and
slavery. And it bundles it up in a nice badass ape revenge movie. (Point, Rise 3-2)
Poster: Not my favorite part of The
Nines. And props to Rise for staying true to the original, whilst still being
original. Which was basically its entire mission statement. (Point, Rise 3-3)
Better Acting: Two Oscar nominees
(Melissa McCarthy and James Franco) didn’t even put up the best performances in
each movie (Ryan Reynolds and Andy Serkis). And who’s going to be the
tie-breaker? Little Elle Fanning beating out John Lithgow, perhaps? Well, I
haven’t been talking for a year about Ryan Reynolds being snubbed by the
Oscars. So congrats Andy. Why the hell not? (Point, Rise 3-4)
More Creative: It would be easy to cash
it in and just say The Nines’ vignette structure and creative handling of the
subject matter and the timely release of information garners yet another award
for creativity. But Rise – well, I think I just talked myself into it. (Point, Nines 4-4)
Watch again: And it’s down to this. And
there’s unfortunately not much I can say about the wall Rise is about to run
into to make it close. There’s no movie that I’ve already seen that I want to
see again as much as The Nines. (Point, Nines 5-4)
Overall: Congrats, Nines. You are a
gentleman and a scholar. And you did it the hard way. You earned it. Winner: The Nines (5-4)
No comments:
Post a Comment