Showing posts with label Definitely Maybe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Definitely Maybe. Show all posts

Friday, January 27, 2012

Double Feature Duel (Rd3): Rise of the Planet of the Apes vs. Definitely, Maybe

Double Feature Duel (Rd3):
Rise of the Planet of the Apes vs. Definitely, Maybe
 
The newest of the Ape movies is the last of the sequels I spent most of this tournament watching. Can it represent the franchise in the Final Four or will the overachieving romantic comedy pull off the upset?

Title: If I have to go onto a second hand in charades, you’re disqualified. (Point, Definitely 0-1)

Funnier: Two words. First one is romantic. Second one… (Point, Definitely 0-2)

Better Turn: I can’t describe to you all enough about how awesome the scene in the little ape jail was. It was badass, emotional and just awesome. (Point, Rise 1-2)

Better Ending: I did enjoy the divorced couple and their daughter show us what it’s really like. But the beginning of the end of the human race was noticeable, yet not overplayed. (Point, Rise 2-2)

Better Message: Don’t tell your middle school daughter about all your sexual escapades from your early 20s. (Point, Rise 3-2)

Better Acting: Tough one. I love Ryan Reynolds. And Abigail Breslin. And Rachel Weisz. But I think Andy Serkis should be talked about in the Oscar race as an ape. But I opened for Adam Ferrara and I’ll let that be the tie-breaker. (Point, Definitely 3-3)

More Creative: Definitely framed a romantic comedy in a new and creative way, but the story and the references to the original series were the most creative movie of 2011, if I get a vote. (Point, Rise 4-3)

Poster: The poster represents the badassery to a tee. (Point, Rise 5-3)

Watch again: As I mentioned in the last entry, I currently have the Netflix DVD in my possession. Kinda hard to beat that in this category. (Point, Rise 6-3)

Overall: Well, good for you, romantic comedy. You made it to the second weekend. Now go home and let the big boys play. Winner: Rise of the Planet of the Apes (6-3)

Saturday, January 21, 2012

Double Feature Duel (Rd2): Brothers Bloom vs. Definitely, Maybe


Double Feature Duel (Rd2):
Brothers Bloom vs. Definitely, Maybe
Wowsers. This one is too close to predict. Normally I can predict the outcome beforehand. Two evenly matched 7-bug movies take the ring. Place your bets.

Title: I do love the punctuation, but the more I read it, the more I read it, the more I think it’s maybe a little cheesy. Definitely. (Point, Brothers 1-0)

Funnier: Hey. Two comedies. I feel like this doesn’t happen too often. But Brothers Bloom was too strong, even for Ryan Reynolds. (Point, Brothers 2-0)

Better Turn: Brothers did make a bunch of turns, but Definitely didn’t have a turny enough turn. Advantage goes to the turnier turns. (Point, Brothers 3-0)

Better Ending: Brothers Bloom reminded me of the Maverick in the way that it kept ending over and over, which isn’t necessarily automatic disqualification. But it was r
efreshing to see a realistic relationship between a divorced father, divorced mother and child. (Point, Definitely 3-1)

Better Message: Again, I’ll cite the realistic nature of the divorced relationship for this category’s sake. (Point Definitely, 3-2)

Better Acting: Rachel Weisz cancels herself out. But in a movie where you were supposed to guess which of three women would end up with the main character, the casting directors did a great job of finding three women who weren’t villainesses. (Point, Definitely 3-3)

More Creative: Definitely was a modern day Princess Bride with Abigail Breslin playing the role of Fred Savage. But it’s also about a guy telling his daughter about all the women he’s been with, which is weird. And Brothers Bloom pulls off a period piece with style. (Point, Brothers 4-3)

Poster: Not really a strength in either case, but I like how in Definitely’s poster, all three women are looking at Ryan Reynolds, who is looking up at his shoulders to the star of the movie, Abigail Breslin, who is the only person looking at the camera. (Point, Definitely 4-4)

Watch again: I’d watch either of these movies again, but I’ll go with the movie that finally told a romantic comedy from the guy’s point of view. You don’t see that often enough. Plus, I own Brothers Bloom on DVD, so I’m a lot less likely to watch it. (Point, Definitely 4-5)

Overall: First Brothers Grimm, then Brothers Bloom. This movie is not kind to brothers. Good thing Will Ferrell and John C. Reilly aren’t in this bracket. Winner: Definitely, Maybe (5-4)

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Double Feature Duel: Definitely, Maybe vs. Brothers Grimm

Double Feature Duel:
Definitely, Maybe vs. Brothers Grimm

Bout #20: A romantic comedy with my new favorite actor and actress vs. a movie I accidentally got because I thought I was putting Brothers Bloom on my Netflix queue.

Definitely, Maybe: Ryan Reynolds is half of a divorced couple who is guilted into telling Abigail Breslin, his middle school daughter, about how he met his mother – sans the Bob Saget voiceover. In an above averagely clever twist, he disguises the names of the three main women in the story so his daughter doesn’t know which one is her mother. One of the women is Rachel Weisz, hot off Brothers Bloom – at least in my world of viewing movies. Romantic comedy, romantic comedy, romantic comedy… the end. 7 bugs.

Brothers Grimm: It’s a dark fairy tale that thought it was a lot funnier than it actually turned out to be. It had surprisingly bad special effects and expected the audience to care about this undeveloped love story. I was unfooled and unmoved and struggled to stay awake to the end, which was not the payoff I was hoping for either. 2 bugs.

Title: Not a lot of movies have commas in the title. Oh Brother, Where Art Thou and Sex, Lies and Videotape are the first that come to mind. It’s a very underutilized punctuation symbol. It gave proper pause to those that had the patience to read it that way you’re supposed to read a comma. (Point, Definitely 1-0)

Funnier: You know how sometimes a comedian tells a punchline so unfunny, he has to indicate it was a punchline that to the audience with a vocal inflection, a raise of the eyebrows and a little lean forward because even though the joke wasn’t funny, he can trick some of the audience members into laughing because they’ve been conditioned to do so? Well, Brothers Grimm desperately tried to do this with cutaways and music. It fell just short of including a rim shot. And I was not tricked. (Point, Definitely, Maybe 2-0)

Better Turn: However weak and confusing the story actually was, the plot point in which the con men run into actual paranormal activity they have to deal with is enough to win this point, as it is difficult to figure out exactly which rejection/reintroduction of which woman constitutes the turn in the romantic comedy. (Point, Brothers 2-1)

Better Ending: If you could stay awake to find out what the ending of Brothers Grimm was, congratulations. (Point, Definitely 3-1)

Better Message: It’s a romantic comedy that actually has a divorced couple that gets along as a divorced couple. That in and of itself is a refreshing part of the movie that makes it more real than most. (Point, Definitely 4-1)

Better Acting: I don’t think Matt or Heath are winning any Oscars for this. And when you’re going up against the guy from Two Guys, a Girl and a Pizza Place, what do you expect? (Point, Definitely 5-1)

More Creative: Brothers Grimm was creative in a way that Jackson Pollack was – which is to say that it wasn’t. Sorry, art students who have to pretend you understand stuff you don’t, but it’s just paint splattered haphazardly on a canvas. And now I’m not talking about Pollack. (Point, Definitely 6-1)

Poster: Both sell the type of movie they are very well. Definitely, Maybe is bright with happy people, the three women are looking at Ryan Reynolds with Abigail on his shoulders, while Heath and Matt are staring intriguingly at the camera surrounded by dark shades of brown with a crystal ball sphere of some sort hanging around. I’ll give Brothers a point for the intriguing “Once Upon a Time” tagline. It doesn’t say too much and it’s not silly as all hell. (Point, Brothers Grimm 6-2)

Watch again: I accidentally got Brothers Grimm this time. Turns out I had already seen it but I barely remembered it because I likely fell asleep the first time too. I may rent it again if I ever get really bad insomnia. (Point, Definitely 7-2)

Overall: Not that I didn’t see Brothers Grimm losing to any other movie, but I’m looking forward to seeing if a straight up romantic comedy can make some waves in the Oxford Quadrant. Winner: Definitely, Maybe (7-2)