Showing posts with label Midnight in Paris. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Midnight in Paris. Show all posts

Friday, March 30, 2012

Double Feature Duel: Super 8 vs. Midnight in Paris

Double Feature Duel:
Super 8 vs. Midnight in Paris
 
A movie by the creators of Lost against a guy who married a chick 35 years younger than him for thelast spot in the Final Four. I’m not sure who I’m rooting for.

Title: Super 8 once again for alluding to a time period while cleverly foreshadowing at least two scenes in this movie. All in 6 characters. (Point, Super 1-0)

Funnier: Midnight in Paris certainly has its funny moments, but I’ll go with the dialogue the kids have with each other over the more difficult-to-interpret Woody Allen-isms. (Point, Super 2-0)

Better Turn: The more I think about it, the more ridiculous that train scene was. But it was still just as awesome. (Point, Super 3-0)

Better Ending: By default and by design. (Point, Midnight 3-1)

Better Message: I really like that Midnight in Paris actually had a message, let alone a good one. One of Woody’s deathbed confessions of sorts. (Point, Midnight 3-2)

Better Acting: Sorry, Owen. I will pick Elle Fanning over you every time. Even in The Nines, when she doesn’t talk. (Point, Super 4-2)

More Creative: I like that we’re never really sure if Owen Wilson is dreaming all this or if it’s really happening. (Point, Midnight 4-3)

Poster: And you kinda knew Super 8 had this category in its back pocket. And it looks like it needed it. (Point, Super 5-3)

Watch again: This is a bit of an unfair question because I watched Super 8 twice in the span of 2 nights. Fortunately it doesn’t matter. (Point, Midnight 5-4)

Overall: And we have our first non 10-bug movie in the Final Four. Which makes sense since there weren’t any in this bracket. And so you know what an accomplishment this is, it’s like the 6 seed making it to the Final Four. In case any of you care. Winner: Super 8 (5-4)

Double Feature Duel (Rd3): Midnight in Paris vs. Sherlock Holmes 2

Double Feature Duel (Rd3):
Midnight in Paris vs. Sherlock Holmes 2
 
Not since the first scored matchup has there been a Sweet 16 matchup with as high a combined Bug Score (17.5). For whatever that’s worth.

Title: I’m sticking with my rule of 5. SH2:AGOS is a marquee changers nightmare. (Point, Midnight 1-0)

Funnier: Whoa! Tough one. The ridiculousness of Adrian Brody playing Dali is one type of humor, but Robert Downey Jr is another. Actually, this isn’t a tough one. Sorry for misleading you. (Point, Sherlock 1-1)

Better Turn: I didn’t see it coming. Which is good enough for a point in a game that doesn’t matter. (Point, Midnight 2-1)

Better Ending: This really is a tough one for real. Well, no it’s not. (Point, Sherlock 2-2)

Better Message: In lieu of the better ending, I’ll wrap it up in the better message category. Because it deserves some recognition in this game that doesn’t matter. (Point, Midnight 3-2)

Better Acting: Rachel McAdams cancels herself out. Taking the lowest common denominator, that pits Jude Law and Downey Jr. against Owen Wilson and a bunch of kinda famous other people. Tiebreaker: Owen Wilson. And not in a good way. (Point, Sherlock 3-3)

More Creative: It’s getting tight! And though I’d give SH2 the “fun” award, I’ll have to go to Woody Allen for the Creativity category. (Point, Midnight 4-3)

Poster: Sherlock just doesn’t have a lot going for it. It was a good run. You’d have probably beat Super 8. (Point, Midnight 5-3)

Watch again: I’ll throw Sherlock a garbage point just out of respect. (Point, Sherlock 5-4)

Overall: Well, you weren’t able to take home any Oscars, but you made it to the Elite 8 in a game that doesn’t matter. How does that make you feel? Winner: Midnight in Paris (5-4)

Double Feature Duel (Rd2): Midnight in Paris vs. Horrible Bosses

Double Feature Duel (Rd2):
Midnight in Paris vs. Horrible Bosses
 
Woody Allen’s Best Picture nominated film vs. a movie with Charlie Day. OK. Could be a good match.

Title: I didn’t watch True Lies for a long time because of how stupid the title was. Horrible Bosses is a little better than that. (Point, Midnight 1-0)

Funnier: Two very different kinds of humor. Horrible Bosses has that in-your-face low burlesque humor working for it, while Midnight in Paris has that high-brow intellectual non-funny type of humor. (Point, Bosses 1-1)

Better Turn: Horrible Bosses’ trailer was pretty much the turn. So I had already seen it. (Point, Midnight 2-1)

Better Ending: It was no Pineapple Express, but I think given an afternoon, at least 4 people in my wedding party could have come up with better endings. (Point, Midnight 3-1)

Better Message: The grass is always greener on the other side of a time-traveling horse-drawn carriage. (Point, Midnight 4-1)

Better Acting: Not to devalue Marion Cotillard’s cuteness and all the 1920s caricatures, but I loved Colin Farrell and Jennifer Aniston in their new calling as comedic villains. (Point, Bosses 4-2)

More Creative: A time traveling writer who longs for days of old only to find that others from the days of old long for days of older, and so on and so on. I’ll buy that. (Point, Midnight 5-2)

Poster: Horrible Bosses, Horrible Poster. (Point, Midnight 6-2)

Watch again: I’d certainly watch either over Tree of Life, but I’d like to sweep up the dirt I may have missed in Midnight in Paris. (Point, Midnight 7-2)

Overall: Sorry Charlie. Winner: Midnight in Paris (7-2)

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Double Feature Duel: Midnight in Paris vs. You Again

Double Feature Duel:
Midnight in Paris vs. You Again
Bout #29: An Oscar-nominated Woody Allen film vs. a get the actors together and then we’ll figure out a plot... thing.

Midnight in Paris: Owen Wilson and Rachel McAdams are back together again in the long-awaited sequel to Wedding Crashers. This was a really fun movie. They talked too much – especially in the beginning, which is typical of Woody Allen movies, but once Owen Wilson found himself transported back in time, the real story began and the conversations seemed a lot less contrived. Which is weird, because he was talked to dead people from another time period. The film definitely sported a few annoying writer’s contrivances and inconsistencies, including Gertrude Stein’s pronunciation of the word “lititure.” And they happened to run into another couple visiting Paris at the same time? I don’t even run into people I know at the Wheaton Mall and I have over 1500 facebook friends. I realize that complaining about this traveling coincidence when people are transported back in time to parties with T.S. Eliot and Hemingway seems picky, but without getting too into too much detail, I’m right. (Ed note: that was actually no detail at all) In addition to the fun at the heart of it, the movie had a working purpose. While Owen Wilson loved his past, the people of that time wished to go back further, and so this would continue until the universe was a singularity (this was cut from the movie for time). But the message goes deeper, and not where you’d expect, when Woody turns the tables on romanticizing the past. 8.5 bugs (out of 10)

You Again: This was your standard “get the right actors on board and then figure it out” movie. The script could have been written on the back of a napkin that said “Kristen Bell, Jamie Lee Curtis, Sigourney Weaver, Betty White.” It was fun in parts, however unoriginal and predictable. It tried to be the hilarious all-girl comedy that Bridesmaids was with big names instead of big talent. And they checked all the boxes. They had the “we’re wearing the same dress” scene and of course the “we’re both somehow throwing each other into the pool together” scene, which was the only use of slow motion in the entire movie by the way. And the director couldn’t even bother to ask the officials from the high school basketball game to tuck their shirts in. Really? That’s the level of attention to detail you have for your product? At least pretend to have some pride in this film. Or was it just a paycheck? 3.5 bugs (out of 10)

Title: Midnight in Paris is descriptive and romantic all at the same time, but You Again can be said with so many different intonations, it’s worth the point for versatility. (Point, You Again 0-1)

Funnier: Both were actually funny, but Woody’s was more introspectively funny. Still, Midnight lost a crapton of points when they had the “same dress” gag and the hot chicks throwing slime on each other. (Point, Midnight 1-1)

Better Turn: I almost immediately assumed getting transported back in time in a 1920s car was going to win this, but then I remembered the scene where we found out that Kristen Bell’s nemesis actually remembered her was quite awesome. Yeah, sure. Why not? (Point, You Again 1-2)

Better Ending: Saving ink. (Point, Midnight 2-2)

Better Message: Midnight teaches you to appreciate the time period you are in. We all romanticize the past. You Again teaches you that if you’re a bitch, don’t get caught. And if you catch someone being a bitch, don’t tell people about it. The movie tried a little too hard to make both of them wrong. (Point, Midnight 3-2)

Better Acting: They didn’t necessarily ask Jamie Lee Curtis, Sigourney Weaver, Kristen Bell and Betty White to act, in their defense. They were just asked to show up. (Point, Midnight 4-2)

More Creative: Ink. (Point, Midnight 5-2)

Poster: The night sky in Paris turns into A Starry Night by Van Gogh. Very nicely done. (Point, Midnight in Paris 6-2)

Watch again: You Again wasn’t horrible, but I’d like a second run at Midnight someday. (Point, Midnight 7-2)

Overall: Down early, a 6-point run to end it was just for show toward the end. Winner: Midnight in Paris (7-2)